The AIN Framework™
​The AIN Framework™ is a systems-aware decision framework designed to help people make sense of complex situations and determine what to do next when responsibility, accountability, and process are unclear.
​
It is structured around three core stages: Awareness, Intervention, and New Beginnings.
​
The framework was originally developed within the domestic violence context, where the consequences of system failure are often most visible.
Working in that space revealed a broader and consistent pattern across multiple systems:
​
Responsibility is shifted onto individuals at the exact moment systems create constraint — and people are then blamed for not coping.
​
AIN evolved in direct response to that pattern.
​
Developed by Zsarina Lovett, the framework draws on lived experience, systems navigation, legal process understanding, and years of advocacy work. It is designed to address the real-world gaps people encounter when navigating institutions, caregiving responsibility, and long-term disruption — not just isolated events or diagnoses.
​
The AIN Framework™ provides a practical structure for individuals, practitioners, and decision-makers to:
-
understand what is actually happening
-
identify where responsibility truly sits
-
recognise where systems are failing or offloading risk
-
move forward with clarity rather than self-blame or overwhelm
AIN is not a therapeutic model or a motivational tool.
It is a decision-making framework for navigating complexity with accuracy, accountability, and informed choice.
​
Why the AIN Framework™ Exists
The AIN Framework™ exists because recognising harm or system failure does not automatically resolve its consequences.
​
Across many contexts, people are expected to stabilise, comply, and move forward while still operating under constraint — fragmented systems, conflicting requirements, and ongoing responsibility that has not been adequately accounted for.
​
This was first observed clearly within domestic violence responses, where leaving an unsafe situation often leads to new forms of instability rather than resolution. Over time, the same pattern became visible across other systems, including ACC, disability support, welfare, housing, healthcare, and long-term caregiving.
​
The common issue is not individual capacity.
It is how systems tighten, fragment, or withdraw — while responsibility is transferred to the person navigating them.
​
AIN was developed to address that gap.
​
What the Framework Is Designed to Do
The AIN Framework™ is designed to provide structure where systems do not.
​
It helps to:
-
make systemic pressure visible rather than personalising it
-
clarify where responsibility genuinely sits
-
support grounded decision-making under constraint
-
reduce confusion when systems are fragmented or contradictory
-
inform better support and policy design by reflecting lived reality rather than assumption
The framework functions both as:
-
a decision-making structure for individuals navigating complex situations, and
-
a systems-thinking tool for practitioners, organisations, and decision-makers seeking to understand why well-intended systems often fail to produce sustainable outcomes.
Why This Framing Matters
AIN does not begin from the assumption that people are broken, deficient, or resistant.
It begins from the reality that many people are responding rationally to unreasonable conditions — and that clarity, structure, and accountability are more effective than motivation, compliance, or pressure.
​
For this reason, the AIN Framework™ is not limited to a single policy area or context.
It continues to evolve as a transferable way of understanding responsibility, constraint, and forward decision-making across systems.
The Three Stages of the AIN Framework™
The AIN Framework™ is structured around three stages that reflect how people actually move through complexity — rather than how systems assume they should.
​
1. Awareness
Understanding what is actually happening
​
Awareness is the stage where confusion is reduced and the situation is named accurately.
It focuses on:
-
recognising patterns of pressure, harm, or constraint
-
identifying where responsibility has been misplaced
-
understanding rights, obligations, and power dynamics within systems
-
separating what belongs to the individual from what belongs to the system
This stage is about orientation — seeing the terrain clearly before decisions are made.
​
2. Intervention
Applying pressure where it matters
Intervention is about determining where and how to act when systems, decisions, and responsibilities collide.
​
It focuses on:
-
navigating systems such as ACC, welfare, housing, health, or advocacy processes
-
identifying appropriate escalation, protection, or challenge
-
reducing harm and stabilising situations through structured decision-making
-
making choices under constraint with clarity rather than urgency
​
Intervention is not about doing everything.
It is about applying pressure in the right place, at the right time.
​
3. New Beginnings
Rebuilding forward with structure
​
New Beginnings focuses on moving forward once immediate pressure has been stabilised.
It involves:
-
rebuilding stability, direction, and practical footing
-
restoring agency after prolonged system or situational constraint
-
strengthening financial, relational, and structural foundations
-
creating a future that is sustainable, not merely managed
New Beginnings is not about returning to who someone was before.
It is about building forward with clarity and agency.
​
Applying the Framework
The AIN Framework™ underpins all of my work, including advocacy, written decision review, and practical resources.
​
The AIN Framework™ Workbook brings these three stages together in a structured, step-by-step format designed for real-world use.
The PDF available here reflects the framework’s original application within the domestic violence context, where AIN was first developed and tested. While the principles are transferable across systems, this version demonstrates how AIN operates in high-constraint, high-impact situations.
​
​
AIN Framework: Research & Systems Analysis
The AIN Framework is not a personal development model.
It is a systems-aware clarity framework grounded in lived experience, pattern recognition, and structural analysis.
For readers who want a deeper, formal articulation of the framework — including its relevance to institutional failure, responsibility transfer, and policy blind spots — a White Paper is available.
​
This document is intended for:
policymakers and institutional stakeholders
advocates and system navigators
researchers and practitioners
organisations seeking clarity-based reform frameworks
It outlines:
the structural pattern AIN was built to name
why individual coping models fail in systemic breakdown
how responsibility transfer creates harm
what successful adoption of AIN looks like in practice
​
Download the AIN Framework White Paper
(PDF · Systems analysis · Not a self-help guide)
​
​
​
​​​
Resources
The AIN Framework™ is supported by a small number of practical resources designed to assist with clear thinking, system navigation, and forward decision-making.
Available resources include:
-
AIN Framework™ Quick Reference Guide (PDF)
-
ACC Advocacy Cheat Sheet
-
System-Aware Communication Toolkit
-
AIN Guided Journal (in development)
These tools are designed for real-world use — whether navigating complexity directly or supporting others within systems.
​
For Practitioners, Advocates, and Organisations
The AIN Framework™ offers a systems-aware lens that complements existing approaches, including national strategies such as Te Aorerekura, while addressing the practical gaps that emerge once responsibility shifts onto individuals.
It can be applied to:
-
support clearer and more coordinated engagement across systems
-
strengthen decision-making under constraint
-
reduce harm caused by fragmented processes and unrealistic expectations
-
centre accountability without pathologising individuals
This application is intended to inform thinking, design, and practice — not replace existing models or services.
​
Collaboration and Use
I engage selectively with practitioners, organisations, and initiatives exploring how the AIN Framework™ may be applied within education, service design, advocacy, or systems reform.
Enquiries are considered on a case-by-case basis.
For discussion or further information:
zsarina2024@gmail.com